
December 2019
Leveraging the opportunities arising from ambitious climate action
Climate change mitigation measures can have a number of positive synergies with other societal goals, referred to as "co-benefits".
The following data highlights the potential synergies of Tanzania, United Republic of in case of sustained action to prevent climate change. The summary of
the analysis is followed by more detailed background data.
Key findings
|
Opportunities for Tanzania, United Republic of |
Savings potential in fuel import expenditures |
If Tanzania, United Republic of halved their spending on fuel imports by installing more domestic renewable energy capacity, it could in total save over 0.981 billion USD |
Potential for improving energy access |
Share of rural population in Tanzania, United Republic of with access to electricity (2016): 16.90% Share of Population with access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking: (2016): 2.16% |
Job creation potential |
Estimated total job creation potential for illustrative scenario: - in Operation and Maintenance: 5,839 to 13,571 jobs over the lifetime of the installations - in Construction and Installation: 97,619 to 233,100 job years distributed over the construction period
|
Air quality and health benefits |
Estimated total number of people dying in from air pollution in Tanzania, United Republic of: - from indoor air pollution (2016): 33,343 - from ambient air pollution (2016): 15,004
|
Background data tables
The following tables present the underlying data and sources. Blank cells indicate that data was not available.
|
source |
unit |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
GDP PPP |
WDI2018 |
billion USD |
31.41 |
33.88 |
39.09 |
44.41 |
48.22 |
45.63 |
47.39 |
52.09 |
Population |
WDI2018 |
millions |
46.10 |
47.57 |
49.08 |
50.64 |
52.23 |
53.88 |
55.57 |
57.31 |
CO2 emission per capita |
WDI2018 |
kt CO2 / count |
0.15 |
0.17 |
0.19 |
0.22 |
0.22 |
|
|
|
Energy Security
Energy systems infrastructure is built to remain for decades. Therefore, decisions on newly built infrastructure need to be considered carefully, to avoid lock-in effects and stranded assets, i.e. investments that are regretted at a later stage. The indicators below provide an overview the potential for synergies of a renewable energy roll-out.
|
source |
unit |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
Energy Independence: Expenditures on fuel imports |
calculation |
billion USD |
2.17 |
3.47 |
3.70 |
4.68 |
3.37 |
5.46 |
1.69 |
1.96 |
Energy Independence: Share of GDP spent on fuel imports |
calculation |
% |
6.92 |
10.24 |
9.47 |
10.55 |
6.98 |
11.97 |
3.56 |
3.77 |
Energy Independence: Savings potential if halving current fuel imports |
calculation |
billion USD |
1.09 |
1.74 |
1.85 |
2.34 |
1.68 |
2.73 |
0.84 |
0.98 |
Energy Access: Population with access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking |
WDI2018 |
% |
1.66 |
1.74 |
1.85 |
1.93 |
2.00 |
2.15 |
2.16 |
|
Energy Access: Rural population with access to electricity |
WDI2018 |
% |
3.70 |
4.10 |
3.60 |
4.20 |
4.25 |
9.00 |
16.90 |
|
Energy Access: Urban population with access to electricity |
WDI2018 |
% |
46.20 |
42.90 |
46.40 |
50.30 |
51.69 |
51.90 |
65.30 |
|
Energy Access: Overall population with access to electricity |
WDI2018 |
% |
14.80 |
14.20 |
15.30 |
16.40 |
18.91 |
18.50 |
32.80 |
|
Energy Access: Primary schools with access to electricity |
SDG_DB_2019 |
% |
|
|
11.87 |
|
|
|
85.43 |
|
Reliability of electricity: Share of firms reporting to have been affected by power outage |
WDI2018 |
% |
|
|
|
85.80 |
|
|
|
|
Reliability of electricity: Number of power outages in businesses in a typical month |
WDI2018 |
count |
|
|
|
8.90 |
|
|
|
|
Reliability of electricity: Value in sales lost by affected businesses due to electrical outages |
WDI2018 |
% |
|
|
|
15.10 |
|
|
|
|
Indicators for energy independence have been calculated based on data from the WDI on expenditures on fuel imports (% of merchandise), data on merchandise value and GDP (all in current USD).
Air pollution and health impacts
The table below shows indicators how Tanzania, United Republic of is currently affected by pollution and could benefit from clean and renewable energy
|
source |
unit |
2016 |
Outdoor air pollution: Crude death rate from ambient air pollution |
SDG_DB_2019 |
1 / 100000 counts |
27.00 |
Indoor air pollution: Crude death rate from household air pollution |
SDG_DB_2019 |
1 / 100000 counts |
60.00 |
Outdoor air pollution: Total number of deaths due to outdoor air pollution |
calculation |
count |
15,004.49 |
Indoor air pollution: Total number of deaths due to indoor air pollution |
calculation |
count |
33,343.32 |
The total number of deaths from indoor and outdoor air pollution have been calculated based on the crude death rate and population data.
Jobs creation potential in Renewable Energy Deployment
Investing in renewable energy can contribute to creating local employment opportunities, such as jobs in construction and installation as well as jobs in operations and maintenance. The distributed nature of renewable energy technologies has great job creation potential also for rural areas. Illustrative calculation of the job potential if Tanzania, United Republic of covered the additional power generation needs of a doubling of their current electricity consumption by wind and solar only.
Job opportunities of wind
|
capacity increase |
Jobs years construction |
Jobs operation |
low projection |
845 MW |
14,597.26 |
1,368.49 |
high projection |
1478 MW |
25,545.21 |
2,394.86 |
Job opportunities of solar
|
capacity increase |
Jobs years construction |
Jobs operation |
low projection |
1183 MW |
83,021.92 |
4,470.41 |
high projection |
2957 MW |
207,554.79 |
11,176.03 |
Blank cells indicate that necessary data was missing for the country, so that the calculation could not be conducted.
Calculation of job potential based on employment factors
Based on capacity factors we calculate the capacity of solar PV and onshore wind to be newly installed for the additional electricity demand resulting from our scenario assumption, i.e. doubling current electricity demand. To account for a variation in capacity factors for wind and solar PV, we show a range, calculating the resulting MW added capacity for a pessimistic capacity factor (i.e. more MW needed to generate the required electricity) assuming a capacity factor of 10% for solar PV and 20% for onshore wind for all LDCs and an optimistic capacity factor (i.e. less MW needed to generate the required electricity) assuming a capacity factor of 25% for solar PV and 35% for onshore wind. To obtain job potential estimates, we apply employment factors for solar PV and onshore wind provided by Rutovitz, J., Dominish, E., & Downes, J. (2015). Calculating global energy sector jobs: 2015 Methodology Update. Prepared for Greenpeace International by the Institute for Sustainable Futures (UTS). Following the methodology suggested by Rutovitz el al. (2015), we multiply the base employment factors for OECD with region-specific multipliers to account for differences in productivity. For this, we use the regional multiplier for the year 2020. Jobs in Operation & Maintenance are calculated by multiplying the calculated MW newly installed capacity to results from our illustrative scenario with the employment factor for Operation and Maintenance. Likewise, jobs years in construction and installation are calculated by multiplying the calculated MW newly installed capacity to results from our illustrative scenario with the employment factor for construction and installation. Jobs in construction and installation are non-permanent and therefore estimated in job years.
References
|
Url |
WDI2018 |
https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/world-development-indicators |
SDG_DB_2019 |
https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database/ |
IRENA_2019 |
http://www.irena.org/IRENADocuments/IRENA_RE_electricity_statistics_-_Query_tool.xlsm |
